Legislators say no to mining in protected forests
Tuesday, June 29 2004 - 12:35 AM WIB
Herman Widyananda, chairman of the House of Representatives (DPR) committee deliberating the perpu, however, said that they would still seek inputs from cabinet ministers, researchers, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
"Almost all legislators question the issuance of the perpu," Herman told The Jakarta Post after the committee's internal meeting here.
The House is expected to issue its final statement on the perpu on July 15, just one day before it goes into recess.
The House has started its deliberation of Perpu No. 1/2004, which stipulates that all mining contracts signed before Law No. 41/1999 on forestry came into effect are valid for the remainder of their terms.
Complementing the perpu, President Megawati Soekarnoputri also issued a decree on May 12, 2004 allowing 13 mining companies to resume operations in protected forests.
Law No. 14/1999, which bans open-pit mining activities in protected forests, prompts several mining companies to suspend their operations.
Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Purnomo Yusgiantoro had previously warned of legal repercussions should Indonesia fail to honor its mining contracts.
Several NGOs had also rejected the perpu, saying that it would only justify forest destruction.
They alleged that Indonesia's forests had been decreasing by about 3.8 million hectares per year, causing the state to lose some Rp30 trillion annually.
Article 22 of the newly amended Constitution stipulates that the President may issue a perpu in an emergency situation. The perpu, however, must win approval from a House plenary meeting, otherwise it will be revoked.
Legislator Andas P. Tanri of the House's forestry commission said that his commission had officially rejected the issuance of the regulation.
The perpu was issued when a team consisting of legislators and officials from the forestry ministry and the energy and mineral resource ministry was carrying out research on mining activities in forest areas.
"The interests of the forestry ministry and the energy and mineral resource ministry are different. They fail to harmonize their conflicting goals," Andas added.
He said that the government regulation was invalid if the House rejected it.
Herman, meanwhile, added that as of Wednesday, the House committee would hear inputs from Coordinating Minister for the Economy Dorodjatun Kuntjorojakti, Minister of Forestry M. Prakosa, Purnomo, environmental groups, research centers, and environmental law expert Koesnadi Hardjasoemantri. (*)
The 13 mining companies:
| No | Company | Area | Concession |
| 1 | Freeport Indonesia Freeport Indonesia | Mimika, Papua Puncak Jayawijaya, Papua | 10,000 ha 2002,380 ha |
| 2 | Karimun Granit | Riau | 2,761 ha |
| 3 | INCO | Sulawesi (North Luwu, Kolaka, Kendari, Morowali) | 218,828 ha |
| 4 | Indominco Mandiri | East Kutai, E. Kalimantan | 25,121 ha |
| 5 | Aneka Tambang | North Maluku | 39,040 ha |
| 6 | Natarang Mining | Lampung | 12,790 ha |
| 7 | Nusa Halmahera Mineral | North Maluku | 29,622 ha |
| 8 | Pelsart Tambang Kencana | South Kalimantan | 201,000 ha |
| 9 | Interex Sacra Raya | East Kalimantan, South Kalimantan | 15,860 ha |
| 10 | Weda Bay Nickel | Central Halmahera, North Maluku | 76,280 ha |
| 11 | Gag Nikel | Sorong, Papua | 13,130 ha |
| 12 | Sorikmas Mining | North Sumatra | 66,200 ha |
| 13 | Aneka Tambang | Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi | 14,570 ha |
